Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Moderators: FourthWorld, heatherlaine, Klaus, kevinmiller, robinmiller
Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Hi all.
A gradient that worked great for me since LC v7 is now rendering with visible lines instead in LC 9.5. (See attached pics for comparison.) Happens on Windows and Macs, in IDE and standalones.
Anyone else have this issue? Solutions?
Thanks,
Tom B.
A gradient that worked great for me since LC v7 is now rendering with visible lines instead in LC 9.5. (See attached pics for comparison.) Happens on Windows and Macs, in IDE and standalones.
Anyone else have this issue? Solutions?
Thanks,
Tom B.
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Unable to reproduce - can you post a sample stack exhibiting the issue?
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Hi Richard.
Here's a stack that shows graphics that demonstrate the problem.
Thanks,
Tom Bodine
Here's a stack that shows graphics that demonstrate the problem.
Thanks,
Tom Bodine
- Attachments
-
- Gradient-Issue.zip
- (6.6 KiB) Downloaded 360 times
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Thanks. Definitely evident here in the example, and it seems an easy fix: the fill gradient looks smooth because it's set to "good", while the stroke gradient is set to "normal". When I change the stroke gradient to "good" it looks, well, good.
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Doh! I should have caught that. Thanks for the quick fix, Richard.
Tom B.
Tom B.
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Shows exactly what Tom shows in the picture here on Win7 (only thing I can run 9.5 on ), but on 8.1.2 the gradient is nice and clear using the same stack with the same settings (good / normal).
Looks like a bug to me. Even though setting it to 'good' will smooth it out, I'd certainly submit it to http://quality.livecode.com/
Looks like a bug to me. Even though setting it to 'good' will smooth it out, I'd certainly submit it to http://quality.livecode.com/
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
Might be a bug. Might also have been a bug fix, in which earlier versions always used "good" even when "normal" was specified. Going through the Release Notes might tell us that, but that's a lot of release notes. Submitting a bug report will at least tell us whether it's a bug or a fix, and I find team comments on such things always helpful.bogs wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 5:00 pmShows exactly what Tom shows in the picture here on Win7 (only thing I can run 9.5 on ), but on 8.1.2 the gradient is nice and clear using the same stack with the same settings (good / normal).
Looks like a bug to me. Even though setting it to 'good' will smooth it out, I'd certainly submit it to http://quality.livecode.com/
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
OK, I will submit a bug report with the sample stack.
Thanks again for your help.
Tom B.
Thanks again for your help.
Tom B.
Re: Gradient no longer smooth in LC9.5
True that, I'll go slogging through the notes and see if I find mention of it there. Good thought Richard!FourthWorld wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:07 amMight be a bug. Might also have been a bug fix, in which earlier versions always used "good" even when "normal" was specified.